DON'T LAUGH AT LAFFER
67BACKGROUND
Art Laffer is a well-known economist. His primary impact in the history of the United States of America has been on tax policy. He is best known as the architect of Ronald Reagan’s tax cuts of the early 1980’s and the ensuing economic explosion of the mid-1980’s.
Arthur Betz Laffer was born on August 14, 1940 in Youngstown, Ohio. Laffer achieved academic honors by winning a BA Degree in Economics from Yale University in 1962 followed on by a MBA in 1965 from Stanford University. He capped off his sojourn in academia with a PHD in Economics from Stanford in 1971.
Laffer has a long list of professional accomplishments. He had founded his own company and is CEO of Laffer and Associates in Nashville, Tennessee. He has given financial advice to many successful government officials over his career in particular on government taxation as related to prosperity within their nations.
LAFFER CURVE
Art Laffer is the first to admit that the so-called “Laffer Curve” was not his original idea. It was a combination of thought he learned from Ibn Khuldun, and John Maynard Keynes. The basic concept was based on the fact that if tax rates were 0% or 100% then government revenues would under both circumstances be zero, and that somewhere in between an ultimate tax rate could be found to both optimize economic activity and government revenues. Laffer differentiates between the arithmetic effect and the economic effect. The trick to optimization was twofold both taxation level and timing. No one has been more adept at exercising these concepts than Laffer. When Art Laffer talks taxation you ignore his advice at your own peril.
The use of The Laffer Curve is the art of interpretation in finding the correct value of the variable “t” (tax rate) on the curve. No one else in history has displayed the artistry in this task as Art Laffer. He made it work for Ronald Reagan and has shown in historical perspective how it worked for presidents Coolidge, and Kennedy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Laffer-Curve.svg
Dr. Laffer was first reported to have shown this curve in 1974 to then Professor at University of Illinois Jude Wanniski, Donald Rumsfeld (Chief of Staff to President Gerald Ford), and Dick Cheney (Rumsfeld's deputy and former classmate at Yale) at the Two Continents Restaurant at the Washington Hotel in Washington, D.C. Laffer recalls Wanniski’s account,” I supposedly grabbed my napkin and a pen and sketched a curve on the napkin illustrating the trade-off between tax rates and tax revenues.” Wanniski named the trade-off "The Laffer Curve." Later Laffer recounted, “I personally do not remember the details of that evening, but Wanniski's version could well be true. I used the so-called Laffer Curve all the time in my classes and with anyone else who would listen to me to illustrate the trade-off between tax rates and tax revenues. My only question about Wanniski's version of the story is that the restaurant used cloth napkins and my mother had raised me not to desecrate nice things."
LAFFER NOW ADVOCATES FLAT TAX
Art Laffer isn’t resting on his laurels he is now advocating a plan for fair flat taxation to be employed by the Federal Government. I have seen him on numerous occasions with Neil Cavuto, and on CSPAN. Laffer has calculated that all Federal taxes can be replaced with a flat tax on all types of income of 15% plus a 3% value added tax (VAT). This includes payroll tax which alone is now greater that 15% for most working Americans. Aside from exclusions for low income Americans no other exclusions would apply.
This is a revolutionary concept. It would allow for the almost complete elimination of the IRS. Laffer has made estimates that this new tax policy would have such a stimulative effect on the economy that full employment could be attained within three to four years of implementation, and Federal revenues would allow for a balanced budget.
Along with the title, Don’t Laugh At Laffer I would also advise you don’t bet against Laffer. LAFFER KNOWS OF WHAT HE SPEAKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Steve Forbes explaines his views on flat tax.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVtVA48kYYg&NR=1&feature=fvwp
CommentsLoading...
Neil Cavuto appears to hold him in high regard as well.
His policy makes good sense.
Speaking of Arthur Laffer--Here he is--
"It would allow for the almost complete elimination of the IRS."
What a great idea.
Sounds like the man to me.
Keep on hubbing!
Dear Tom,
Fascinating hub. I agree with this position, a flat tax is the answer instead of all this convoluted complicated formula that nobody really understands. Even the head of the IRS can't do his own taxes!
My recollection is that President George H.W. Bush called Laffer's theory "voodoo economics." Conventional economists are skeptical of Laffer.
A flat tax is the fairest way to levy taxes. Right now the "rich" has loopholes, the "poor" is exempt or limited, and the middle class bears the burden. Not what I call fair.
I have been an advocate for a flat tax for years. No need for an accountant, what ever I earn, I pay a percentage. Best yet, NO IRS AUDITS!!!!
Because it makes sense, it probably doesn't have a chance.
The flat tax would not work for this administration, it lacks total control.
I like the flat tax idea. The idea was considered by congress in the late 80's, but so many lobbied to keep their exemptions that what emerged from the tax system overhaul was similar to what we had in place already.
I take issue with Laffer's support of a VAT. I don't trust VATs at all. They can be too readily expanded by an over-the-top congress (like we have now). I'm not laughing at Laffer-I love the flat tax concept; I just don't like VATs.
What if they put in the bill (should it ever be fortunate enough to become a bill) that all rates are fixed and cannot be raised or lowered? This would mean that the only possible increase in revenue would be through an increase in A. Jobs created B. New businesses started and C. Increase in taxable population. All of which are a benefit to the country and economy.
















Pamela99 Level 7 Commenter 2 years ago
Tom, I have wondered for a while now if a flat tax wouldn't be a good answer to tax collection. Those that don't pay taxes because maybe they are drug dealers would pay on all their purchases. Those that have more, spend more and would be willing to pay the tax. I guess it wouldn't be a simple change but the IRS is sure complicated, messy bureaucracy. Good hub. Something to think about is good.